After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Via lie diagnosis tools examined at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilised in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to run these systems and to go after their legal right for safeguard.

It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from being able to view the programs of safeguard. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: while they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and read review ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.